Last updated: 13 October 2026
Why Energy Efficiency Matters More for Commercial Steel
For commercial projects focused on energy efficiency, Fabco’s W20+ is the clear choice. It achieves an A+ Window Energy Rating and a U-value of 1.3-1.4 W/m²K, which exceeds current Building Regulations Part L requirements through both the U-value route and the rating route.
Commercial buildings typically have far greater glazed surface areas than residential ones. A single glazed façade with poor thermal performance can push heating and cooling costs up significantly across a building’s lifetime.
Traditional single-glazed steel performs even worse at 5.0 W/m²K or above – more than three times worse than the W20+.
Regulatory pressure adds another layer. Part L for commercial buildings (Part L2) sets tighter benchmarks than residential equivalents, and BREEAM assessments – which many commercial clients now target – reward A-rated or better window specifications. Specifying a system that only just meets the minimum doesn’t leave room for the fabric energy credits that can make or break a BREEAM rating.
Getting the system choice right from the start is the only way to avoid costly redesigns later.
Criterion 1: Thermal Performance – What Numbers Actually Matter
The U-value is what matters most on any window datasheet. Measured in W/m²K, it shows how much heat escapes through the glazing per square metre for every degree of temperature difference. Lower numbers are better.
For commercial projects in 2026, Building Regulations Part L sets the bar. Your glazing needs to hit it, or you’ll face problems at sign-off.
Here’s what the real-world numbers look like:
- Traditional single-glazed steel: 5.0+ W/m²K – essentially a thermal hole in your wall
- Fabco W20 standard system: approximately 2.0 W/m²K, achieving a B-rated Window Energy Rating (WER) – meets Part L via the rating route
- Fabco W20+: 1.3-1.4 W/m²K, rated A+ – *exceeds* current Part L requirements on both the U-value and rating routes
For most commercial specs, the W20+ is what you should be asking for. That 1.3 W/m²K figure for fixed lights isn’t just a score on paper. It’s the gap between a building that passes energy assessment with room to spare and one that barely scrapes through.
Pay attention to the glazing spec too. Fabco’s 18mm slimline unit uses a 4mm/10mm/4mm krypton-filled cavity. Krypton beats the more common argon fill – and that matters when slim sightlines limit how thick the unit can be.
Criterion 2 & 3: Durability, Compliance, and Certification Stacking
Thermal numbers alone won’t get a commercial project signed off. Specifiers also need to navigate Building Regulations Part L, enhanced security standards like PAS 24, and fire compartmentation requirements such as FD30. Stacking the right certifications from the start saves costly remedial work later, and choosing a system with proven long-term durability directly reduces whole-life cost across a building’s lifespan.
Fabco W20+ for Commercial Thermal and Compliance Priority
Pros:
- Achieves an A+ Window Energy Rating with a whole-window U-value of 1.3-1.4 W/m2K, satisfying both the U-value route and the rating route under Building Regulations Part L simultaneously, removing ambiguity during Building Control sign-off.
- Hot-dip galvanised to British Standards with powder-coated finish and non-rusting stainless steel fixings, giving a verifiable corrosion-resistance specification that supports multi-decade service life and reduces maintenance budget pressure.
- PAS 24 compliant specification available as an upgrade with enhanced multi-point locking and security-tested laminated glazing, covering commercial security obligations alongside thermal ones in a single system.
Cons:
- Higher initial unit cost than the standard W20 system, which may require stronger lifecycle-cost justification during procurement approval.
- Not fire-rated, so any commercial project with FD30 compartmentation requirements needs a separate W40 specification for those specific openings.
Fabco W40 for Fire-Compartmentation Zones
Pros:
- Independently assessed by Warringtonfire, providing up to 30 minutes FD30 integrity-only fire resistance across doors and screens, not doorsets only, which broadens the scope of compliant applications.
- Mechanically fixed steel glazing beads retain fire-rated glass during a fire event, giving Building Control a clear, testable retention method rather than an adhesive or clip-based assumption.
- Maintains authentic steel aesthetics with slim sightlines, meaning fire-rated zones don’t visually break the design language of the wider commercial scheme.
Cons:
- W40 uses a larger, more substantial profile than W20, which means sightline dimensions differ between fire-rated and non-fire-rated areas of the same project.
Verdict: For most commercial projects focusing on energy efficiency, the W20+ handles thermal compliance and security certification in one system, while W40 covers the fire-rated zones separately. Specifying both under a single supplier with directly employed installation teams keeps accountability in one place across the whole building envelope.
Criterion 4 & 5: Integration and Total Cost Analysis
Two questions tend to get skipped: how does the glazing system fit into the wider building, and what does it actually cost over time?
Integration matters on commercial projects because your glazing choice affects mechanical systems too. A well-performing facade with a U-value of 1.3-1.4 W/m²K (like the W20+) reduces peak heating demand, which can directly influence HVAC plant sizing. Smaller plant means lower capital spend and lower running costs year after year.
That’s a real project saving, not a theoretical one.
Total cost analysis should work across at least a 25-year horizon on commercial buildings. Steel’s inherent resistance to warping and dimensional movement means maintenance intervals are far longer than most alternative frame materials. Traditional single-glazed steel typically carries a U-value of 5.0 W/m²K or worse; the W20 closes that gap to 2.0 W/m²K, and the W20+ closes it further still. That difference in heat loss compounds meaningfully across a building’s energy bills over decades.
The W20+ also achieves an A+ Window Energy Rating, which can support stronger BREEAM credits and influence your EPC assessment. Both factors affect asset value and tenantability.
When you run those numbers honestly across integration savings, operational costs, and compliance value, premium steel glazing stops looking expensive and starts looking like the more disciplined choice.
Common Selection Mistakes in Commercial Steel Specifications
Even experienced specifiers make the same mistakes when choosing steel glazing for commercial projects. Here are the ones that cost the most.
Can I use U-value alone to confirm Building Regulations Part L compliance?
Not always. The W20 standard system sits at approximately 2.0 W/m²K, which does not meet the 1.4 W/m²K U-value route for Part L. However, it does qualify via the Window Energy Rating route using its B rating. Specifiers who only check U-values often reject compliant products or, worse, approve non-compliant ones. Always confirm which compliance route applies to your project before finalising specifications.
Is the cheapest steel system the most cost-effective choice for a commercial project?
Rarely. Steel installed in the early twentieth century is still in service today, which tells you that lifecycle cost matters far more than purchase price. A system with a 1.3 W/m²K U-value like the W20+ reduces heating demand measurably over decades. Factor in replacement cycles, maintenance costs, and energy savings before comparing quotes.
Does every internal steel door need to be fire-rated?
No, and specifying FD30 fire doors where they are not required adds unnecessary cost and complexity. The W40 FD30 system, assessed by Warringtonfire, is designed for fire compartmentation applications only. Standard internal screens use the W20 profile. Confirm requirements with Building Control and your fire engineer before specifying.
Do all steel glazing systems look the same from the outside?
No. The W20 and W20+ systems share identical 10mm sightlines externally, but their internal engineering differs significantly. Specifying standard W20 when A+ energy rating performance is needed means a costly redesign. Confirm the required Window Energy Rating, either B or A+, at the outset.
Does it matter whether the installation team is directly employed or subcontracted?
On commercial projects, yes. When surveying, manufacturing, and wet glazing pass between separate contractors, accountability gaps open up. Fabco uses directly employed project engineers, surveyors, fitters, and glazing engineers, with 3D laser surveys completed before production begins. That single chain of responsibility reduces errors that are expensive to fix post-installation.
Summary
You’ve got the framework. Now put it to work.
Stack your criteria in order of priority: thermal performance first, then durability and certification, then integration, then whole-life cost.
For commercial projects where energy efficiency matters most, Fabco’s W20+ system deserves a direct conversation. It achieves an A+ Window Energy Rating with a U-value of 1.3-1.4 W/m²K, exceeds Part L, and uses krypton-filled 4/10/4 slimline double glazing within 10mm sightlines.
Here’s what sets them apart: Fabco assigns a dedicated project engineer to every project and carries out 3D laser surveys before manufacture begins. That removes two of the most common sources of specification error.
Talk to their team early. Commercial steel specifications reward lead time.